Johnson v The Queen [2018] HCA 48

Johnson v The Queen [2018] HCA 48

With the exception of the earliest incident (the 'bath incident'), the evidence of other sexual misconduct was admissible on the trial of each remaining count as it substantially assisted the contextual evaluation of the complainant's allegations, and the risk of prejudicial effect did not outweigh probative value. Any wrongly admitted evidence did not occasion a miscarriage of justice. The joinder of counts did not occasion a miscarriage and the appeal should be dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Ian Douglas Johnson; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate (high Court)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Discreditable Conduct Evidence, Propensity Evidence, Joinder of Charges, Sexual Offences, Admissibility of Evidence, Context/rule of Evidence
Criminal Law Evidence Discreditable Conduct Evidence Propensity Evidence Joinder of Charges Sexual Offences Admissibility of Evidence Context/rule of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Douglas Johnson

Appellant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate (high Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence of the appellant's other alleged sexual misconduct was admissible on the trial of each remaining count under Evidence Act 1929 (SA), s 34P
  2. 2 Whether the joinder of counts occasioned a miscarriage of justice
  3. 3 Whether the probative value of the evidence for a permitted use substantially outweighed the prejudicial effect

Ratio Decidendi

With the exception of the earliest incident (the 'bath incident'), the evidence of other sexual misconduct was admissible on the trial of each remaining count as it substantially assisted the contextual evaluation of the complainant's allegations, and the risk of prejudicial effect did not outweigh probative value. Any wrongly admitted evidence did not occasion a miscarriage of justice. The joinder of counts did not occasion a miscarriage and the appeal should be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed