McKenzie v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1480
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA088/16 approved subject to conditions set out in Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'section 34 Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 should be given effect by disposing of the proceedings in accordance with the agreed decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA088/16 approved subject to conditions set out in Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. DA088/16 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house and the erection of a cabana at 23 Springdale Road, Killara is determined by approving the application subject to conditions set out in Annexure A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment