MacDonald v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2014] NSWSC 206
The imputations pleaded are capable of arising from the material as published. In relation to particulars for publication on the internet, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to provide all facts, matters and circumstances of publication, including identities of persons to be relied on as having viewed the material, per UCPR and the bilateral nature of internet publication.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ian Michael MacDonald; Defendant: Australian Broadcasting Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Application refused in part, granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Imputations, Internet Publication, Particulars of Publication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Michael MacDonald
Plaintiff
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ex Tempore Judgment on Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imputations pleaded are capable of arising from the matters complained of
- 2 Whether further particulars are required for publication of internet content
Ratio Decidendi
The imputations pleaded are capable of arising from the material as published. In relation to particulars for publication on the internet, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to provide all facts, matters and circumstances of publication, including identities of persons to be relied on as having viewed the material, per UCPR and the bilateral nature of internet publication.
Court Disposition
Application refused in part, granted in part
Orders
- Order the plaintiff to file and serve the amended statement of claim with any necessary amendments to Schedules A and B by 11 March 2014.
- The plaintiff to serve all facts, matters and circumstances of publication of the second matter complained of including the identity of any person he proposes to rely on (other than the plaintiff himself) who viewed the second matter complained of by 11 March 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment