Ian Ross Constructions Pty Ltd V Blacktown City Council [1999] NSWLEC 235
The proposed development's elongated two-storey built form, particularly the 51 m group of five dwellings, would be visually dominating, intrusive and out of character with the surrounding residential precinct of single detached dwellings. Together with the sevenfold increase in household density and cumulative DCP non-compliances indicating overdevelopment, the proposal would interfere with the amenity of the surrounding residential area and should be refused under the EP&A Act s 79C.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Pursuant to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 S 97 Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed and development consent refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['medium Density Housing' 'residential Amenity' 'development Control Plan Compliance' 'local Environmental Plan Zone Objectives' 'deemed Refusal Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Pursuant to Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 S 97 Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed seven townhouse medium density housing development was generally consistent with the Residential 2(a) zone objectives under Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1988, especially objective (d).' 'Whether the proposed development would interfere with the amenity of the surrounding residential area.' 'Whether non-compliance with Blacktown Development Control Plan 1992 standards indicated overdevelopment of the site.' 'Whether drainage, tree removal and local resident objections justified refusal of development consent.' 'Whether development consent should be granted or refused under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development's elongated two-storey built form, particularly the 51 m group of five dwellings, would be visually dominating, intrusive and out of character with the surrounding residential precinct of single detached dwellings. Together with the sevenfold increase in household density and cumulative DCP non-compliances indicating overdevelopment, the proposal would interfere with the amenity of the surrounding residential area and should be refused under the EP&A Act s 79C.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed and development consent refused.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Development consent refused.' 'Exhibits be returned.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment