SENDY, Ian William v R [2009] NSWCCA 299
Despite errors in calculation of discounts and wrongful aggravation regarding bail status, the effective sentences imposed were within the available range considering the seriousness, aggregate nature, and sentencing discretion. No lesser sentence was warranted at law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'discount for Guilty Plea' 'aggravation' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'larceny' 'indecency' 'break and Enter']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in differentiating between the utilitarian value of the guilty pleas for discount purposes' 'Whether an error was made in aggravating sentence on the basis that offence was committed on bail' 'Whether s 44(2) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 was correctly applied in determining the non-parole periods and balance of term without a finding of special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite errors in calculation of discounts and wrongful aggravation regarding bail status, the effective sentences imposed were within the available range considering the seriousness, aggregate nature, and sentencing discretion. No lesser sentence was warranted at law.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment