R v Salim [2023] NSWLC 8

R v Salim [2023] NSWLC 8

Section 111 of the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) creates a strict liability offence; while the defendant honestly believed he did not have an illicit drug present in his oral fluid when driving, his belief was not reasonable in the circumstances and therefore he failed to establish an honest and reasonable mistake of fact. All elements of the charge were proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Parties
Prosecution: Police; Defendant: Ibrahim Salim
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Principal Judgment Trial and Decision
Outcome
Defendant found guilty under s 111 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).
Legal Topics
Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact, Strict Liability, Road Transport Act Offences, Illicit Drugs and Driving, Evidential Burden, Exculpation
Criminal Law Traffic Law Honest and Reasonable Mistake of Fact Strict Liability Road Transport Act Offences Illicit Drugs and Driving Evidential Burden Exculpation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Police

Prosecution

Ibrahim Salim

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Principal Judgment Trial and Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s 111 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) is an absolute or strict liability offence
  2. 2 Whether the defendant can rely on the ground of exculpation of honest and reasonable mistake of fact
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's belief was both honest and reasonable

Ratio Decidendi

Section 111 of the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) creates a strict liability offence; while the defendant honestly believed he did not have an illicit drug present in his oral fluid when driving, his belief was not reasonable in the circumstances and therefore he failed to establish an honest and reasonable mistake of fact. All elements of the charge were proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Defendant found guilty under s 111 Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW).

Orders

  • The defendant failed to meet the evidentiary standard of honest and reasonable mistake of fact.
  • All ingredients of the charge were established beyond reasonable doubt.