R v Diallo & Ors (No 12); Re an application for bail by witness MM [2024] NSWSC 1087
Bail is granted to MM because he has previously complied with appearing at court on subpoena, has provided address details, promises to attend the next day, and the prosecution does not oppose bail.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Defendant: Ibrahima Diallo; Defendant: AG; Defendant: AD; Defendant: Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise; Witness: MM
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Application by Witness Arrested Under Bench Warrant
- Outcome
- Conditional bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Bench Warrant, Witness Subpoena
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ibrahima Diallo
Defendant
AG
Defendant
AD
Defendant
Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise
Defendant
MM
Witness
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application by Witness Arrested Under Bench Warrant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail should be granted to a witness arrested under bench warrant for failing to appear on subpoena
Ratio Decidendi
Bail is granted to MM because he has previously complied with appearing at court on subpoena, has provided address details, promises to attend the next day, and the prosecution does not oppose bail.
Court Disposition
Conditional bail granted
Orders
- Witness MM to be granted bail on the condition that he go directly from court to his nominated home address and remain there overnight, coming directly back to court the following day.
- Address and phone number of MM to remain confidential, only to be accessed by a judge of this Court or higher jurisdiction, or by registry staff for bail undertaking purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment