Diallo & Ors (No 15) [2024] NSWSC 1114
The probative value of the Macquarie Dictionary extract was found to be wafer-thin compared to its significant potential for prejudice and risk of misleading the jury on the meaning of 'to smoke' given the idiosyncratic language in evidence; as such, the tender of the dictionary extract was rejected.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Defendant: Ibrahima Diallo; Defendant: AG; Defendant: AD; Defendant: Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- Tender of dictionary extract rejected
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Dictionary Evidence, Consciousness of Guilt, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ibrahima Diallo
Defendant
AG
Defendant
AD
Defendant
Panashe Morgan Ryan Karise
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extract from the Macquarie Dictionary can be admitted to prove the colloquial meaning of 'to smoke' as used by an accused in a recorded conversation.
Ratio Decidendi
The probative value of the Macquarie Dictionary extract was found to be wafer-thin compared to its significant potential for prejudice and risk of misleading the jury on the meaning of 'to smoke' given the idiosyncratic language in evidence; as such, the tender of the dictionary extract was rejected.
Court Disposition
Tender of dictionary extract rejected
Orders
- The tender of an extract of the Macquarie Dictionary to prove a colloquial meaning of the verb 'to smoke' is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment