Regina v ICC [2002] NSWCCA 119

Regina v ICC [2002] NSWCCA 119

Although questions of substance were raised and special circumstances existed, particularly the desirability of extended parole supervision, the sentences were not manifestly excessive. The offences were serious, were committed over three years and ten months, involved a high-order abuse of trust by the applicant as the victim's father, and no lesser sentences or non-parole periods were warranted. Achieving a longer parole period would require increasing the overall sentences, which the Court would not do.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['serious Sexual Offences' 'aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'aggravated Indecent Assault' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'rehabilitation' 'protective Custody']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['serious Sexual Offences' 'aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'aggravated Indecent Assault' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'rehabilitation' 'protective Custody']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed for serious sexual offences were manifestly excessive.' "Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to address rehabilitation and the applicant's subjective features." 'Whether special circumstances warranted longer periods on parole or reduced non-parole periods.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although questions of substance were raised and special circumstances existed, particularly the desirability of extended parole supervision, the sentences were not manifestly excessive. The offences were serious, were committed over three years and ten months, involved a high-order abuse of trust by the applicant as the victim's father, and no lesser sentences or non-parole periods were warranted. Achieving a longer parole period would require increasing the overall sentences, which the Court would not do.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']