IceTV Pty Ltd v Ross & ors [2008] NSWSC 1428

IceTV Pty Ltd v Ross & ors [2008] NSWSC 1428

Due to the significant overlap of issues and witnesses between the main proceedings and the second cross-claim, and in the interests of ensuring fairness and efficiency, the second cross-claim should be heard with the main proceedings. Further, as all parties could not fairly conduct the hearing in February if the proceedings were combined and considering the limited prejudice to the defendants, the February hearing dates should be vacated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Interlocutory Application on Case Management
Outcome
Second cross-claim to be heard with main proceedings; February hearing dates vacated; proceedings adjourned for mention with directions for further pleadings.
Legal Topics
['cross Claims' 'case Management' 'vacation of Hearing Dates' 'oppression Proceedings']
['civil Procedure'] ['cross Claims' 'case Management' 'vacation of Hearing Dates' 'oppression Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings / Interlocutory Application on Case Management

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the second cross-claim should be heard with the main proceedings' 'Whether the hearing dates in February 2009 should be vacated' 'Whether the defendants would be prejudiced by vacating the hearing dates']

Ratio Decidendi

Due to the significant overlap of issues and witnesses between the main proceedings and the second cross-claim, and in the interests of ensuring fairness and efficiency, the second cross-claim should be heard with the main proceedings. Further, as all parties could not fairly conduct the hearing in February if the proceedings were combined and considering the limited prejudice to the defendants, the February hearing dates should be vacated.

Court Disposition

Second cross-claim to be heard with main proceedings; February hearing dates vacated; proceedings adjourned for mention with directions for further pleadings.

Orders

  • ['Set aside order 4 made on 17 November 2008 (second cross-claim to be determined separately and after the primary proceedings)' 'Vacate the hearing appointed to commence 23 February 2009' 'Adjourn proceedings to 6 February 2009 for mention at 11:00am' 'Defendants to notify the plaintiff and lodge with the associate...