Icon Construction Group Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2019] NSWLEC 1156
Because the parties reached agreement on amended plans, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the proposal retained the heritage listed terraces and had an acceptable impact on their identified heritage significance, the jurisdictional prerequisites were met and the agreed decision was one the Court could make; the appeal was therefore upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Consent Orders Made
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 2018/0138 approved subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'exceedance of Height of Buildings Development Standard' 'heritage Listed Terraces']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Consent Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites under cl 5.10(4) of the Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012 were satisfied.' 'Whether the proposed development had an acceptable impact on the heritage significance of the terraces, "Leah Building".']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement on amended plans, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the proposal retained the heritage listed terraces and had an acceptable impact on their identified heritage significance, the jurisdictional prerequisites were met and the agreed decision was one the Court could make; the appeal was therefore upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 2018/0138 approved subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the Development Application by relying on amended plans listed in condition 1 of the conditions of consent at Annexure A.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment