I.D.A. Safe Constructions Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2023] NSWLEC 1185
The Court accepted Mr Frecker's expert evidence in the absence of contrary evidence, was satisfied of the flood planning matters under cl 5.21 of Wyong Local Environmental Plan 2013, and found that the modified development was substantially the same as the originally approved development because its performance in a flood event remained substantially the same, with improved performance in smaller flood events and an overall reduction in flood impact notwithstanding the changed width of the two box culverts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Modification Application Under S 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning Development Consent No 1591/2017 / Final Orders; Appeal Upheld and Development Consent Modified
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and Development Consent No 1591/2017 is modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' '72 Lot Subdivision' 'box Culverts' 'flood Impacts' 'substantially the Same Development' 'orders by Consent of Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Modification Application Under S 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Concerning Development Consent No 1591/2017 / Final Orders; Appeal Upheld and Development Consent Modified
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Development Consent No 1591/2017 should be modified to alter the size and location of two box culverts.' 'Whether the development as modified is substantially the same development as the development for which consent was originally granted.' 'Whether the flood planning matters in cl 5.21 of Wyong Local Environmental Plan 2013 were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted Mr Frecker's expert evidence in the absence of contrary evidence, was satisfied of the flood planning matters under cl 5.21 of Wyong Local Environmental Plan 2013, and found that the modified development was substantially the same as the originally approved development because its performance in a flood event remained substantially the same, with improved performance in smaller flood events and an overall reduction in flood impact notwithstanding the changed width of the two box culverts.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and Development Consent No 1591/2017 is modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent No 1591/2017 for a 72 lot subdivision (comprising 69 residential lot, 2 residue lots and 1 detention basin lot) and the creation and dedication of a park, at Lots 10 & 11 in Deposited Plan 1177776 and Lot 31 in Deposited Plan 23810, known as 10 Oscar Drive & 51 Geoffrey...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment