Police v Ruddick [2023] NSWLC 16
Police initially attended under their welfare and protective duties after reports of a man acting erratically and possibly attempting self-harm. Once they observed the defendant in a public place holding a screwdriver and carrying multiple knives and dangerous implements, s 23 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Custody of Knives in a Public Place Without Reasonable Excuse and Resisting Police in Execution of Duty / Hearing After Not Guilty Plea; Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Both offences proven beyond reasonable doubt.
- Legal Topics
- ['custody of Knife in Public Place' 'reasonable Excuse' 'police Welfare Check' 'search and Detention for Dangerous Implements' 'resisting Police in Execution of Duty']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Custody of Knives in a Public Place Without Reasonable Excuse and Resisting Police in Execution of Duty / Hearing After Not Guilty Plea; Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant had custody of knives in a public place without reasonable excuse contrary to s 11C Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW).' 'Whether police were acting in the execution of their duty when they stopped, searched, detained and arrested the defendant.' "Whether the defendant's conduct involved physical action amounting to resisting police contrary to s 60(1AA) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)."]
Ratio Decidendi
Police initially attended under their welfare and protective duties after reports of a man acting erratically and possibly attempting self-harm. Once they observed the defendant in a public place holding a screwdriver and carrying multiple knives and dangerous implements, s 23 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) empowered them to stop, search and detain him without needing to arrest him or rely on s 21. The defendant offered no reasonable excuse for custody of the knives. His physical actions in shaking off police, walking away despite force being applied, and requiring restraint by two officers and a member of the public amounted to resisting police while...
Court Disposition
Both offences proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Orders
- ['The knives and screwdriver are forfeited to the Police.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment