Igloo Homes v Sammut Constructions [2004] NSWSC 1213
On the proper construction of the contract, the purchaser was required to pay the balance stated, plus GST, based on a special condition overriding the printed form. The claim for rectification failed as the plaintiff did not discharge the onus of proving that the vendor shared a common intention for the price to be inclusive of GST.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / First Instance Judgment (supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division)
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['goods and Services Tax (gst)' 'rectification' 'contract Construction' 'sale of Land' 'vendor and Purchaser']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / First Instance Judgment (supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the contract sale price was inclusive or exclusive of GST' 'Whether the contract should be rectified to reflect a common intention that price included GST']
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of the contract, the purchaser was required to pay the balance stated, plus GST, based on a special condition overriding the printed form. The claim for rectification failed as the plaintiff did not discharge the onus of proving that the vendor shared a common intention for the price to be inclusive of GST.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed
Orders
- ['Proceedings dismissed' 'Plaintiff to pay costs of defendant']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment