Iglu No. 211 Pty Ltd v Bayside Council [2022] NSWLEC 1534
The proposed modifications satisfy all relevant statutory prerequisites and result in a development substantially the same as approved. The parties' agreed outcome is one the Court could make, so the appeal is upheld and modified consent is granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Iglu No. 211 Pty Ltd; Respondent: Bayside Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Modification Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development consent modified
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Development Consent, Conciliation Conference, Development Contributions, Planning Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iglu No. 211 Pty Ltd
Applicant
Bayside Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Modification Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modifications satisfy the jurisdictional prerequisites under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the development, as modified, is substantially the same as the originally approved development
- 3 Whether parties' agreement can be accepted and orders made per s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed modifications satisfy all relevant statutory prerequisites and result in a development substantially the same as approved. The parties' agreed outcome is one the Court could make, so the appeal is upheld and modified consent is granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development consent modified
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Consent No. DA-2019/385 is modified in the terms in Annexure B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment