Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2015] FCA 1225
It promotes efficiency and the overarching purpose of the Federal Court Act and Rules to make a lump sum costs order where costs are properly incurred, the amount is reasonable, and requiring taxation would unnecessarily prolong the dispute and increase expense.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application for Lump Sum Costs Order / Post Judgment (costs Application)
- Outcome
- Application for lump sum costs order granted
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'lump Sum Costs' 'disability Support Pension Appeals' 'party Representation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application for Lump Sum Costs Order / Post Judgment (costs Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the first respondent's costs should be awarded in a lump sum rather than taxed costs" 'Whether costs claimed by the Secretary were improperly, unreasonably or negligently incurred' 'Whether misconduct by Australian Government Solicitor justifies disallowance of costs']
Ratio Decidendi
It promotes efficiency and the overarching purpose of the Federal Court Act and Rules to make a lump sum costs order where costs are properly incurred, the amount is reasonable, and requiring taxation would unnecessarily prolong the dispute and increase expense.
Court Disposition
Application for lump sum costs order granted
Orders
- ["The first respondent's costs be awarded in a lump sum of $8,500 instead of taxed costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment