Illawarra Retirement Trust v Denham Constructions Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1173

Illawarra Retirement Trust v Denham Constructions Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1173

The adjudicator performed the task required by the Act because he considered the payment claim, the payment schedule, IRT's asserted entitlement to liquidated damages, Denham's position on extensions of time, and the TBH material, and reached a reasoned conclusion that IRT had not shown any entitlement to liquidated damages and that Denham was entitled to repayment of the securities. Non-jurisdictional error of law on the face of the record was not an available ground of review. The Superintendent's later cl 40A.2 certificate did not provide a sufficient basis to restrain Denham from enforcing its statutory interim right under the adjudication determination, because any contractual right...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 2015
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court Proceedings Concerning Validity and Enforcement of an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw) / Principal Judgment on Summons
Outcome
Summons dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['adjudication Determinations' 'jurisdictional Error' 'error of Law on the Face of the Record' 'liquidated Damages' 'extensions of Time' 'issue Estoppel' 'permanent Injunction' 'termination for Convenience' 'final Certification Under Construction Contract']
['building and Construction' 'security of Payment' 'contract Law' 'equity'] ['adjudication Determinations' 'jurisdictional Error' 'error of Law on the Face of the Record' 'liquidated Damages' 'extensions of Time' 'issue Estoppel' 'permanent Injunction' 'termination for Convenience' 'final Certification Under Construction Contract']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Supreme Court Proceedings Concerning Validity and Enforcement of an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (nsw) / Principal Judgment on Summons

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the adjudicator's determination in respect of payment claim 26 was void because the adjudicator failed to decide an essential element of Denham's claim, namely entitlement to extensions of time." "Whether the adjudicator's determination was reviewable for error of law on the face of the record." 'Whether IRT was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining enforcement of the determination because the Superintendent later determined under cl 40A.2 that Denham was not entitled to any further payment.']

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator performed the task required by the Act because he considered the payment claim, the payment schedule, IRT's asserted entitlement to liquidated damages, Denham's position on extensions of time, and the TBH material, and reached a reasoned conclusion that IRT had not shown any entitlement to liquidated damages and that Denham was entitled to repayment of the securities. Non-jurisdictional error of law on the face of the record was not an available ground of review. The Superintendent's later cl 40A.2 certificate did not provide a sufficient basis to restrain Denham from enforcing its statutory interim right under the adjudication determination, because any contractual right...

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order that the summons be dismissed.' "Order the plaintiff to pay the first defendant's costs." 'Otherwise make no order as to costs.' 'Direct that the exhibits be handed out.']