Imperial Bottle Shops Pty Limited v. Lismore City Council [1989] NSWLEC 233
The Court accepted that there was an immediate need for additional neighbourhood shopping facilities in the vicinity and that the site was zoned and generally appropriate for a smaller scale neighbourhood shopping centre, but refused the particular application because it was a poorly designed overdevelopment of the site, with inadequate and congested vehicular circulation, insufficient parking and loading arrangements, inadequate setbacks and landscaping, inappropriate hardstand areas adjoining the public reserve, and unacceptable bulk and scale in the residential environment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Consent for a Neighbourhood Shopping Centre / Judgment After Hearing; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development consent refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'neighbourhood Shopping Centre' 'zoning and Draft Rezoning' 'traffic Access and Parking' 'koala Food Trees' 'commercial Centre Planning Strategy' 'overdevelopment and Site Design']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Consent for a Neighbourhood Shopping Centre / Judgment After Hearing; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for a neighbourhood shopping centre on land zoned Neighbourhood Business 3(c) at Taylor Avenue and Rous Road, Goonellabah.' "Whether the proposed development was inconsistent with Council's commercial and shopping facilities strategy, the North Coast Regional Environmental Plan 1988, and draft residential rezoning proposals." 'Whether traffic access, parking, loading, circulation, landscaping, setbacks, bulk and scale made the proposal unsuitable or an overdevelopment of the site.' 'Whether concerns about koala food trees and the relationship with nearby and proposed centres justified refusal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted that there was an immediate need for additional neighbourhood shopping facilities in the vicinity and that the site was zoned and generally appropriate for a smaller scale neighbourhood shopping centre, but refused the particular application because it was a poorly designed overdevelopment of the site, with inadequate and congested vehicular circulation, insufficient parking and loading arrangements, inadequate setbacks and landscaping, inappropriate hardstand areas adjoining the public reserve, and unacceptable bulk and scale in the residential environment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development consent refused.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Development consent refused.' 'Exhibits may be released.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment