Granite Arms v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2003] FCA 506
The word 'importer' in clause 4.1 of Part 1 of Schedule 6 of the Customs (Prohibited Import) Regulations 1956 (Cth) is given its ordinary and natural meaning, encompassing Granite Arms as the importer, despite acting as agent for Omeo Way. There is no statutory basis to restrict 'importer' to the owner at law, and Granite Arms, as consignee with lawful entitlement, satisfies the Police authorisation test.
- Parties
- First Applicant/first Cross Respondent: Granite Arms Pty Limited (ACN 006 551 748); Second Applicant/second Cross Respondent: Omeo Way Pty Limited (ACN 050 415 355); Respondent/cross Claimant: Chief Executive Officer of Customs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- cross claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Importation Under Customs (prohibited Import) Regulations, Definition of Importer, Statutory Construction, Seizure and Forfeiture of Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Granite Arms Pty Limited (ACN 006 551 748)
First Applicant/first Cross Respondent
Omeo Way Pty Limited (ACN 050 415 355)
Second Applicant/second Cross Respondent
Chief Executive Officer of Customs
Respondent/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'importer' in clause 4.1 of Part 1 of Schedule 6 of the Customs (Prohibited Import) Regulations 1956 (Cth) refers only to the owner at law or includes an agent
- 2 Whether Granite Arms, acting as agent for Omeo Way, satisfies the Police authorisation test for importation
Ratio Decidendi
The word 'importer' in clause 4.1 of Part 1 of Schedule 6 of the Customs (Prohibited Import) Regulations 1956 (Cth) is given its ordinary and natural meaning, encompassing Granite Arms as the importer, despite acting as agent for Omeo Way. There is no statutory basis to restrict 'importer' to the owner at law, and Granite Arms, as consignee with lawful entitlement, satisfies the Police authorisation test.
Court Disposition
cross claim dismissed
Orders
- The cross claim is dismissed.
- The cross claimant pay the cross respondents their costs of and incidental to the cross claim, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment