Oakey Abbatoir Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1984] FCA 316
The arrangement constituted a non-commercial, artificial, and circular tax avoidance scheme, which fell within s.260 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. Section 260 was applicable, rendering the arrangement ineffective for the purpose of avoiding tax, and exposing the appellant to additional tax under s.104.
- Parties
- Appellant/cross Respondent: Oakey Abattoir Pty. Ltd.; Respondent/cross Appellant: The Commissioner of Taxation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Single Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Tax Avoidance, Application of S.260, Distribution by Prepayment of Interest, Convertible Notes, Division 7 of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oakey Abattoir Pty. Ltd.
Appellant/cross Respondent
The Commissioner of Taxation
Respondent/cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Single Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the prepayment of interest on convertible notes constituted a sufficient distribution under Division 7 of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 to avoid additional tax under s.104.
- 2 Whether the scheme was a sham or had commercial justification.
- 3 Whether the payment was interest within the meaning of s.82R(6).
Ratio Decidendi
The arrangement constituted a non-commercial, artificial, and circular tax avoidance scheme, which fell within s.260 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. Section 260 was applicable, rendering the arrangement ineffective for the purpose of avoiding tax, and exposing the appellant to additional tax under s.104.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment