Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v KPB [2013] NSWLC 12
Given the escalating sexual intrusiveness, breach of trust, age difference, and grooming behaviour, together with a finding of substantial harm to the victim and partial cumulation required to reflect total criminality, no penalty other than imprisonment is appropriate; good character is not mitigating due to its assistance in commission of offence; partial cumulation of sentences ensures public confidence in justice administration.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender convicted of all charges; custodial sentences (partially cumulative) imposed for indecent assaults; bond imposed for breach of Apprehended Violence Order.
- Legal Topics
- ['indecent Assault' 'sentencing' 'grooming' 'breach of Trust' 'good Character Relevance' 'cumulation of Penalty' 'victim Impact Statements' 'likelihood of Re Offending']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for indecent assault against a child' "Relevance of 'grooming' and breach of trust in sentencing" 'Application of discount due to guilty plea' 'Effect of good character and lack of criminal record' 'Assessment of victim impact statement' 'Cumulation vs concurrency of sentences' 'Likelihood of re-offending and rehabilitation']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the escalating sexual intrusiveness, breach of trust, age difference, and grooming behaviour, together with a finding of substantial harm to the victim and partial cumulation required to reflect total criminality, no penalty other than imprisonment is appropriate; good character is not mitigating due to its assistance in commission of offence; partial cumulation of sentences ensures public confidence in justice administration.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted of all charges; custodial sentences (partially cumulative) imposed for indecent assaults; bond imposed for breach of Apprehended Violence Order.
Orders
- ['Sequence 1: 9 months imprisonment (non-parole period 6 months, balance 3 months)' 'Sequences 2 and 4: 14 months imprisonment (non-parole period 9 months, balance 5 months)' 'Sequence 3: 19 months imprisonment (non-parole period 12 months, balance 7 months)' 'Partial cumulation between sentences to address total...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment