Callaway v Callaway; The Estate of Aileen Margaret Callaway (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 1295
The plaintiff/cross-defendant did not achieve an outcome more favourable to the defendant/cross-claimant than was offered in the Calderbank letter; the offer mirrored the actual result, so the threshold for awarding indemnity costs under Calderbank principles was not satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/equity / Costs Application After Judgment
- Outcome
- No additional costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'costs Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate/equity / Costs Application After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded on the basis of a Calderbank offer made by the plaintiff/cross-defendant']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff/cross-defendant did not achieve an outcome more favourable to the defendant/cross-claimant than was offered in the Calderbank letter; the offer mirrored the actual result, so the threshold for awarding indemnity costs under Calderbank principles was not satisfied.
Court Disposition
No additional costs orders made
Orders
- ['Make no additional costs orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment