Butler, J.H. v Ex parte Taylor, A.R. [1995] FCA 420
A limited indemnity for costs (promise to fund trustee's litigation to recover shares) given by specific creditors is sufficient to trigger the discretion under s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), but due to the modest risk assumed, the limited notice to other creditors, and the proportionality of debts, it is only just and equitable that indemnifying creditors receive a capped advantage ($15,000 per estate, shared rateably), with the balance distributed according to ordinary statutory priorities.
- Parties
- Bankrupt: James Harkness Butler; Bankrupt: Noel Braithwaite Eustace; Applicant Trustee: Alan Richard Taylor; Creditor (indemnifying): Abermere Pty Ltd; Creditor (indemnifying): North Pine Motors Pty Ltd; Creditor (indemnifying): Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd; Respondent Creditor: Bank of New Zealand Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Post Litigation Distribution of Proceeds
- Outcome
- Indemnifying creditors to receive a specified sum in priority, balance distributed to all creditors as per statutory priorities. Costs of both trustee and Bank of New Zealand to be paid out of the estates.
- Legal Topics
- Indemnity for Costs, Priorities Between Creditors, Distribution of Proceeds, Court Discretion Under S.109(10) Bankruptcy Act 1966
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Harkness Butler
Bankrupt
Noel Braithwaite Eustace
Bankrupt
Alan Richard Taylor
Applicant Trustee
Abermere Pty Ltd
Creditor (indemnifying)
North Pine Motors Pty Ltd
Creditor (indemnifying)
Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd
Creditor (indemnifying)
Bank of New Zealand Limited
Respondent Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Post Litigation Distribution of Proceeds
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an offer to fund litigation by creditors to a trustee amounts to an indemnity for costs within the meaning of s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- 2 Whether and to what extent the creditors providing such indemnity should receive an advantage over other creditors in distribution of proceeds recovered from litigation
- 3 Whether it is just and equitable to make such an order in light of the risks assumed and notice to other creditors
Ratio Decidendi
A limited indemnity for costs (promise to fund trustee's litigation to recover shares) given by specific creditors is sufficient to trigger the discretion under s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), but due to the modest risk assumed, the limited notice to other creditors, and the proportionality of debts, it is only just and equitable that indemnifying creditors receive a capped advantage ($15,000 per estate, shared rateably), with the balance distributed according to ordinary statutory priorities.
Court Disposition
Indemnifying creditors to receive a specified sum in priority, balance distributed to all creditors as per statutory priorities. Costs of both trustee and Bank of New Zealand to be paid out of the estates.
Orders
- In the administration of each bankrupt estate (James Harkness Butler and Noel Braithwaite Eustace), upon realisation of the relevant share in Transborder, after payment of costs and expenses incurred in recovering the share, Abermere Pty Ltd, North Pine Motors Pty Ltd, and Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd are paid $15,000...
- The costs of Alan Richard Taylor (trustee) and Bank of New Zealand Limited of and incidental to the applications be costs in the administration of the estate and paid out of the estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment