Butler, J.H. v Ex parte Taylor, A.R. [1995] FCA 420

Butler, J.H. v Ex parte Taylor, A.R. [1995] FCA 420

A limited indemnity for costs (promise to fund trustee's litigation to recover shares) given by specific creditors is sufficient to trigger the discretion under s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), but due to the modest risk assumed, the limited notice to other creditors, and the proportionality of debts, it is only just and equitable that indemnifying creditors receive a capped advantage ($15,000 per estate, shared rateably), with the balance distributed according to ordinary statutory priorities.

Parties
Bankrupt: James Harkness Butler; Bankrupt: Noel Braithwaite Eustace; Applicant Trustee: Alan Richard Taylor; Creditor (indemnifying): Abermere Pty Ltd; Creditor (indemnifying): North Pine Motors Pty Ltd; Creditor (indemnifying): Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd; Respondent Creditor: Bank of New Zealand Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 June 1995
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Post Litigation Distribution of Proceeds
Outcome
Indemnifying creditors to receive a specified sum in priority, balance distributed to all creditors as per statutory priorities. Costs of both trustee and Bank of New Zealand to be paid out of the estates.
Legal Topics
Indemnity for Costs, Priorities Between Creditors, Distribution of Proceeds, Court Discretion Under S.109(10) Bankruptcy Act 1966

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Harkness Butler

Bankrupt

Noel Braithwaite Eustace

Bankrupt

Alan Richard Taylor

Applicant Trustee

Abermere Pty Ltd

Creditor (indemnifying)

North Pine Motors Pty Ltd

Creditor (indemnifying)

Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd

Creditor (indemnifying)

Bank of New Zealand Limited

Respondent Creditor

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application / Post Litigation Distribution of Proceeds

  1. 1 Whether an offer to fund litigation by creditors to a trustee amounts to an indemnity for costs within the meaning of s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether and to what extent the creditors providing such indemnity should receive an advantage over other creditors in distribution of proceeds recovered from litigation
  3. 3 Whether it is just and equitable to make such an order in light of the risks assumed and notice to other creditors

Ratio Decidendi

A limited indemnity for costs (promise to fund trustee's litigation to recover shares) given by specific creditors is sufficient to trigger the discretion under s.109(10) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), but due to the modest risk assumed, the limited notice to other creditors, and the proportionality of debts, it is only just and equitable that indemnifying creditors receive a capped advantage ($15,000 per estate, shared rateably), with the balance distributed according to ordinary statutory priorities.

Court Disposition

Indemnifying creditors to receive a specified sum in priority, balance distributed to all creditors as per statutory priorities. Costs of both trustee and Bank of New Zealand to be paid out of the estates.

Orders

  • In the administration of each bankrupt estate (James Harkness Butler and Noel Braithwaite Eustace), upon realisation of the relevant share in Transborder, after payment of costs and expenses incurred in recovering the share, Abermere Pty Ltd, North Pine Motors Pty Ltd, and Sungold Petroleum Pty Ltd are paid $15,000...
  • The costs of Alan Richard Taylor (trustee) and Bank of New Zealand Limited of and incidental to the applications be costs in the administration of the estate and paid out of the estate.