Independent Audit Services Pty Ltd v Elite Aquatic School Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 279

Independent Audit Services Pty Ltd v Elite Aquatic School Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 279

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Judicial Registrar's orders did not mandate that each case be heard separately, required the parties to consider the possibility of concurrent hearings, and provided for case management consistent with relevant legal principles; no appellable error, error of principle, or clear injustice was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['appeals' 'interlocutory Decisions' 'practice and Procedure' 'case Management']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal is required for interlocutory order under Section 127(1) of the District Court Act 1973 (NSW)' 'Whether Judicial Registrar failed to take into account relevant considerations in not ordering concurrent hearing of 13 related cases' 'Appropriate principles governing appeals from exercise of discretion, particularly procedural decisions']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the Judicial Registrar's orders did not mandate that each case be heard separately, required the parties to consider the possibility of concurrent hearings, and provided for case management consistent with relevant legal principles; no appellable error, error of principle, or clear injustice was established.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs']