R v Holmes; Ex parte Victorian Employers' Federation [1980] HCA 37

R v Holmes; Ex parte Victorian Employers' Federation [1980] HCA 37

The Commissioner's refusal to proceed to a finding of dispute was based on erroneous grounds: the Federation's covering letter and log were sufficiently certain, and r. 3 of the Federation's rules authorised it to pursue members' interests and make demands with interstate characteristics. Clause 1 did not oust the Commission's jurisdiction and raised no present ambit objection. The remaining allegation that there was no genuine industrial dispute had not been examined by the Commission and should be considered there in the first instance. Mandamus should issue.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Mandamus / Application to Make Absolute an Order Nisi for Mandamus
Outcome
Application granted; order for mandamus made.
Legal Topics
['industrial Dispute Extending Beyond the Limits of One State' 'capacity of Registered Organisation to Make Industrial Demands' 'log of Claims' 'ambit Doctrine' 'mandamus']
['industrial Law' 'administrative Law' 'constitutional Law'] ['industrial Dispute Extending Beyond the Limits of One State' 'capacity of Registered Organisation to Make Industrial Demands' 'log of Claims' 'ambit Doctrine' 'mandamus']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Mandamus / Application to Make Absolute an Order Nisi for Mandamus

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the demands made by the Federation were sufficiently certain for the purposes of the Act and the Constitution.' "Whether the Federation's rules allowed it to represent its members in relation to trade, business, profession or calling carried on both in Victoria and other States and to make industrial demands with interstate characteristics." 'Whether the making of the demands by the Federation and the non-acceptance of them by the Association gave rise to an industrial dispute within the meaning of the Act.' 'Whether clause 1 of the log of claims would oust the jurisdiction of the Commission or was too uncertain for want of a definable ambit.' 'Whether there was, on the evidence, a genuine industrial dispute.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Commissioner's refusal to proceed to a finding of dispute was based on erroneous grounds: the Federation's covering letter and log were sufficiently certain, and r. 3 of the Federation's rules authorised it to pursue members' interests and make demands with interstate characteristics. Clause 1 did not oust the Commission's jurisdiction and raised no present ambit objection. The remaining allegation that there was no genuine industrial dispute had not been examined by the Commission and should be considered there in the first instance. Mandamus should issue.

Court Disposition

Application granted; order for mandamus made.

Orders

  • ['Order for mandamus.']