Australian Insurance Staffs' Federation Claimant; and Accident Underwriters' Association [1923] HCA 61
A dispute over wages and employment conditions between employers engaged in banking or insurance and their employees is an 'industrial dispute' within sec. 51 (xxxv) of the Constitution and the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1921. This encompasses clerical and other non-manual employees as industrial employees; the constitutional power is not confined to undertakings carried on wholly or mainly by means of manual labour.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Australian Insurance Staffs' Federation; Respondents: The Accident Underwriters' Association and Others; Claimant: The Bank Officials' Association; Respondents: The Bank of Australasia and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Stated Case / High Court of Australia Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Questions answered in the affirmative
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Disputes, Conciliation and Arbitration, Banking Employees, Insurance Employees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Australian Insurance Staffs' Federation
Claimant
The Accident Underwriters' Association and Others
Respondents
The Bank Officials' Association
Claimant
The Bank of Australasia and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Stated Case / High Court of Australia Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a dispute between banking/insurance employers and employees over wages and conditions is an 'industrial dispute' within sec. 51 (xxxv) of the Constitution and the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act
Ratio Decidendi
A dispute over wages and employment conditions between employers engaged in banking or insurance and their employees is an 'industrial dispute' within sec. 51 (xxxv) of the Constitution and the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1921. This encompasses clerical and other non-manual employees as industrial employees; the constitutional power is not confined to undertakings carried on wholly or mainly by means of manual labour.
Court Disposition
Questions answered in the affirmative
Orders
- The stated questions are answered 'Yes' in both cases (that is, the disputes are 'industrial disputes' within the meaning of the Constitution and the Act).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment