Marcuola-Bel v Tran [2004] NSWSC 173
The evidence of the attesting witnesses to the 21 July 2002 will was accepted as credible and reliable, establishing that the will was executed by the deceased on that date. Therefore, the will of 21 July 2002 revoked the prior will of 31 March 1998, and probate of the latter is to be granted in solemn form, revoking the previous grant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ines Marcuola-Bel; Defendant: Thi Ly Tran
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Determination of Validity of Later Will and Revocation of Prior Grant
- Outcome
- Probate of 1998 will revoked; probate in solemn form of 2002 will granted; plaintiff awarded costs against defendant, no indemnity costs.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant of Probate, Validity of Testamentary Instruments, Grant in Solemn Form
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ines Marcuola-Bel
Plaintiff
Thi Ly Tran
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Determination of Validity of Later Will and Revocation of Prior Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 21 July 2002 will was executed by the deceased on that date and should revoke the 31 March 1998 will and grant of probate in favour of the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the attesting witnesses to the 21 July 2002 will was accepted as credible and reliable, establishing that the will was executed by the deceased on that date. Therefore, the will of 21 July 2002 revoked the prior will of 31 March 1998, and probate of the latter is to be granted in solemn form, revoking the previous grant.
Court Disposition
Probate of 1998 will revoked; probate in solemn form of 2002 will granted; plaintiff awarded costs against defendant, no indemnity costs.
Orders
- The grant of probate to the defendant of the deceased’s will dated 31 March 1998 be revoked.
- Grant (exhibit 2) to be deposited in the Registry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment