Ozaras v Inner West Council; John v Inner West Council [2021] NSWLEC 1270
The DA was refused because, although framed as minor building works to replace walls and roof elements required to be retained under the CDC, the previously existing walls, roof and footings on which the CDC depended had been demolished and the proposed works were substantial components of a residential development. The Court held that a purpose had to be ascribed to the DA works and that the CDC, DA and BIC works had to be considered as aspects of the whole development. In those circumstances the Applicant should have sought full development consent for a residential dwelling and attached secondary dwelling, enabling assessment under the applicable planning controls including LLEP2013,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Environmental Planning Appeals Against Deemed Refusals of Development Application Da/2020/0429 and a Building Information Certificate Application / Final Determination After Concurrent Hearing
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed; Development Application DA/2020/0429 refused; Building Information Certificate dated 10 January 2020 refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'complying Development Certificate' 'building Information Certificate' 'alterations and Additions' 'residential Use' 'purpose of Development' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No 55—remediation of Land' 'development Standards' 'public Interest' 'orderly Development']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Environmental Planning Appeals Against Deemed Refusals of Development Application Da/2020/0429 and a Building Information Certificate Application / Final Determination After Concurrent Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether consent should be granted for a development application framed as minor building works to construct part walls and part roof connected with an existing complying development certificate after the previously existing buildings, roof and footings had been demolished.' 'Whether a purpose must be ascribed to the proposed DA works so that permissibility and applicable planning controls can be identified.' 'Whether the DA could be assessed as minor building works relying on the CDC, or required assessment by reference to the whole resulting residential development and applicable controls including LLEP2013, LDCP2013 and SEPP 55.' 'Whether granting consent in the circumstances would be consistent with the public interest and orderly development.' 'Whether a Building Information Certificate should issue for concrete piers and a waffle pod slab where the related DA was refused and contamination information was lacking.']
Ratio Decidendi
The DA was refused because, although framed as minor building works to replace walls and roof elements required to be retained under the CDC, the previously existing walls, roof and footings on which the CDC depended had been demolished and the proposed works were substantial components of a residential development. The Court held that a purpose had to be ascribed to the DA works and that the CDC, DA and BIC works had to be considered as aspects of the whole development. In those circumstances the Applicant should have sought full development consent for a residential dwelling and attached secondary dwelling, enabling assessment under the applicable planning controls including LLEP2013,...
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed; Development Application DA/2020/0429 refused; Building Information Certificate dated 10 January 2020 refused.
Orders
- ['Proceedings 2020/226535: The appeal is dismissed.' 'Proceedings 2020/226535: Development Application DA/2020/0429 is refused.' 'Proceedings 2020/226535: The exhibits are returned except for A-H, J, L, 1 (Tabs 6-9 pp 590-651), 2, 4, 5 and 7.' 'Proceedings 2020/226536: The appeal is dismissed.' 'Proceedings...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment