Anupam Das & Anor v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1609
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision by making the agreed orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Agreement at or After a Conciliation Conference Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld and Development Application No. D/2017/78, as amended, was approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Agreement at or After a Conciliation Conference Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' 'Whether Development Application No. D/2017/78, as amended, should be approved subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision by making the agreed orders.
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld and Development Application No. D/2017/78, as amended, was approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. D/2017/78 and to rely upon the amended plans and documents behind Annexure "A".' 'Development Application No. D/2017/78 (as amended) for alterations and additions to the existing dwelling including a new first floor level...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment