Wright v Inner West Council [2024] NSWLEC 1231
The Court was satisfied on the evidence and the parties' jurisdictional assessment that the agreed modified development remained substantially the same as the approved development, caused no further environmental impact, addressed notification and submissions, was consistent with the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022, improved resident amenity and functionality, and presented no jurisdictional impediment. Because the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Relating to Modification Application Mod/2023/0209 Seeking to Amend Conditions Attached to Development Consent Da/2022/1149 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties and Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Consent DA/2022/1149 modified by consent and made subject to consolidated conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'onsite Parking Condition' 'torrens Title Subdivision Plan Correction' 'conciliation Conference' 'residential Amenity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Relating to Modification Application Mod/2023/0209 Seeking to Amend Conditions Attached to Development Consent Da/2022/1149 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Agreement Between the Parties and Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could modify Development Consent DA/2022/1149 by consent under s 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in accordance with the parties' agreement." 'Whether the modifications were substantially the same as the originally approved development and caused no further environmental impact.' 'Whether notification, submissions, owner consent and other jurisdictional requirements for the modification application were satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied on the evidence and the parties' jurisdictional assessment that the agreed modified development remained substantially the same as the approved development, caused no further environmental impact, addressed notification and submissions, was consistent with the Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022, improved resident amenity and functionality, and presented no jurisdictional impediment. Because the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Consent DA/2022/1149 modified by consent and made subject to consolidated conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent DA/2022/1149 is modified by consent in the terms set out in Annexure A.' 'Development Consent DA/2022/1149 is subject to the consolidated conditions as modified by the Court and described in Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment