SafeWork NSW v Integrated Agricultural Developments Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 243
IAD's failure to take reasonably practicable steps to minimise the risk of death or serious injury associated with quad bike operation, combined with failure to consult and coordinate with the labour hire provider, constitutes breaches of its duties under ss 19(1) and 46 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The level of culpability was assessed as mid-range, with mitigating factors including early guilty plea, remorse, absence of previous convictions, good character and rehabilitation prospects. General and specific deterrence warranted substantial penalties, and no reduction was made for capacity to pay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction and fines imposed; orders for payment of prosecutor's costs; orders for distribution of fines to prosecutor as per statute.
- Legal Topics
- ['duty of Care' 'consultation Duties' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'mitigating and Aggravating Factors' 'quad Bike Safety' 'penalty Assessment' 'prosecution Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Integrated Agricultural Developments Pty Ltd failed to comply with its work health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)' 'Whether Integrated Agricultural Developments Pty Ltd failed to consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities with LJ Priest under s 46 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)' 'Assessment of appropriate penalty, taking into account objective seriousness, mitigating and aggravating factors, deterrence, and capacity to pay']
Ratio Decidendi
IAD's failure to take reasonably practicable steps to minimise the risk of death or serious injury associated with quad bike operation, combined with failure to consult and coordinate with the labour hire provider, constitutes breaches of its duties under ss 19(1) and 46 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW). The level of culpability was assessed as mid-range, with mitigating factors including early guilty plea, remorse, absence of previous convictions, good character and rehabilitation prospects. General and specific deterrence warranted substantial penalties, and no reduction was made for capacity to pay.
Court Disposition
Conviction and fines imposed; orders for payment of prosecutor's costs; orders for distribution of fines to prosecutor as per statute.
Orders
- ['Integrated Agricultural Developments Pty Ltd is convicted under s 19(1) WHS Act; fine of $180,000 imposed (after 25% reduction for early guilty plea).' '50% of the $180,000 fine to be paid to the prosecutor per s 122(2) Fines Act 1996 (NSW).' "Integrated Agricultural Developments Pty Ltd to pay prosecutor's costs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment