Staniland v Integrity New Homes Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 157
Although the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of the legislative costs provisions and in the calculation of the amount in dispute, it ultimately exercised its power to award costs and, having considered the conduct of both parties and other relevant discretionary factors, its decision to reduce the appellants' costs to 65% was not manifestly unjust or unfair, and should not be disturbed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Decision of Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeal' 'discretion' 'home Building']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Costs Decision of Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal erred in reducing the appellants' costs to 65% of costs on the usual basis" 'Whether the wrong legislative scheme was applied for determining costs in proceedings commenced prior to the establishment of NCAT' "Interpretation of 'amount claimed or in dispute' for costs discretion"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of the legislative costs provisions and in the calculation of the amount in dispute, it ultimately exercised its power to award costs and, having considered the conduct of both parties and other relevant discretionary factors, its decision to reduce the appellants' costs to 65% was not manifestly unjust or unfair, and should not be disturbed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'Each party is to pay their own costs of the appeal.' 'If either party seeks a different costs order, submissions are to be filed and served, with specified timeframes and requirements as set out in the orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment