Inter Mining Pty Ltd v Lake Johnston Pty Ltd, in the matter of Lake Johnston Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 915
The omission of the boxed warning on the statutory demand was a defect but did not render the demand a nullity. As no substantial injustice resulted from the omission, the application for summary dismissal could not succeed.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations (winding Up Application) / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'form 509 H Compliance' 'winding Up in Insolvency' 'defect in Statutory Demand' 'summary Dismissal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations (winding Up Application) / Interlocutory Application for Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether omission of the boxed warning in a statutory demand (Form 509H) renders it invalid or a nullity.' 'Whether omission amounts to a defect or something more fundamental.' 'Whether the application should be summarily dismissed in light of any defect.']
Ratio Decidendi
The omission of the boxed warning on the statutory demand was a defect but did not render the demand a nullity. As no substantial injustice resulted from the omission, the application for summary dismissal could not succeed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The defendant's interlocutory application dated 23 July 2013 is dismissed." "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to the application in any event, to be taxed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment