PRECISION RUBBER SERVICES v PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL [1995] NSWCA 377

PRECISION RUBBER SERVICES v PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL [1995] NSWCA 377

The summons was dismissed because leave was not timely; points argued were reserved for appeal against final orders.

Parties
Claimant: Precision Rubber Services; Opponent: Parramatta City Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 April 1995
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Decision / Court of Appeal
Outcome
Summons dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Decision, Preliminary Question, Appeals Against Orders in Separate Questions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Precision Rubber Services

Claimant

Parramatta City Council

Opponent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Decision / Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether leave was sought in a timely manner for appeal against an interlocutory order on a preliminary question

Ratio Decidendi

The summons was dismissed because leave was not timely; points argued were reserved for appeal against final orders.

Court Disposition

Summons dismissed

Orders

  • Summons dismissed
  • Points argued reserved for appeal against final orders