Cope v Home [2002] NSWSC 777
The statutory moratorium under s.440D Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) precludes enforcement of contractual rights by legal proceedings against a company in administration absent leave; balance of convenience favours administrators' freedom from injunction; orders restraining sale are not to be continued.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Interlocutory Injunction / Application for Continuation of Interlocutory Orders
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders not continued; injunction relief refused
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunction' 'voluntary Administration' 'moratorium on Legal Proceedings' 'assertion of Property Rights']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Interlocutory Injunction / Application for Continuation of Interlocutory Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether sale of STACC's business would breach contractual obligations to plaintiffs under agreement of 22 November 2001" 'Whether plaintiffs are entitled to interlocutory injunction restraining administrators from sale' 'Effect of statutory moratorium under s.440D Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) on enforcement of contractual obligations']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory moratorium under s.440D Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) precludes enforcement of contractual rights by legal proceedings against a company in administration absent leave; balance of convenience favours administrators' freedom from injunction; orders restraining sale are not to be continued.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders not continued; injunction relief refused
Orders
- ['Orders 1 and 2 made on 21 August and continued on 23 August until 5pm will not be further continued']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment