International Alpaca Management Pty Ltd v Ensor, B.K.E. & Ors [1995] FCA 541

International Alpaca Management Pty Ltd v Ensor, B.K.E. & Ors [1995] FCA 541

Respondents were substantially successful on the various issues, and the issues on which applicants succeeded did not involve substantial time or complexity. There was no basis to deprive the respondents of any portion of their costs. Accordingly, respondents should have their full costs, including the costs of the interlocutory application before Foster J.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 July 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Application Following Judgment on Claim
Outcome
Applicants to pay respondents' costs of proceedings, including interlocutory application and costs application.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'sale of Goods' 'contract Law' 'possessory Title' 'unjust Enrichment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Costs Application Following Judgment on Claim

  1. 1 ['Whether successful respondents should be restricted to half their taxed costs' 'Whether issues were unnecessarily litigated by respondents' 'Whether partial success by applicants is sufficient to displace the usual rule that costs follow the event']

Ratio Decidendi

Respondents were substantially successful on the various issues, and the issues on which applicants succeeded did not involve substantial time or complexity. There was no basis to deprive the respondents of any portion of their costs. Accordingly, respondents should have their full costs, including the costs of the interlocutory application before Foster J.

Court Disposition

Applicants to pay respondents' costs of proceedings, including interlocutory application and costs application.

Orders

  • ["Applicants pay the respondents' costs of the proceedings, including the interlocutory application before Foster J, and the costs of this application in relation to costs."]