International Alpaca Management Pty Ltd & Ors v Ensor, B.K.E. & Ors [1995] FCA 581
On the available financial information, there is a risk the applicants would not be able to satisfy any costs order without delay. Given the deterioration in financial position, lack of updated evidence, and the effect of the stay depriving respondents of judgment, security for costs should be a condition of the stay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Stay Pending Appeal and Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered as a condition of granting stay pending appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'stay of Orders' 'discretion Under S 56 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Stay Pending Appeal and Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether security for costs should be ordered as a condition of granting a stay pending appeal' 'What financial information is sufficient to resist security for costs']
Ratio Decidendi
On the available financial information, there is a risk the applicants would not be able to satisfy any costs order without delay. Given the deterioration in financial position, lack of updated evidence, and the effect of the stay depriving respondents of judgment, security for costs should be a condition of the stay.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered as a condition of granting stay pending appeal.
Orders
- ['Applicants must provide security for costs of appeal as condition of stay.' 'Parties to tender short minutes of order reflecting other agreed conditions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment