R v Phillip Michael SUMMERFIELD [2019] NSWDC 126
The offender committed serious offences of intimidation, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and sexual intercourse without consent in a domestic context in breach of apprehended violence orders. Sentences must reflect the seriousness, need for specific and general deterrence, and community protection. An aggregate sentence consistent with s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 is appropriate, with partial accumulation to account for subsequent offending. The offender's background and partial engagement in rehabilitation afford minimal mitigation. Imprisonment is the only appropriate sentence.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecution (Crown); Offender: Phillip Michael Summerfield
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing and Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed, sentences confirmed; offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- Intimidation, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, Domestic Violence, Breach of Apprehended Violence Order, Public Justice Offences, Driving While Suspended
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecution (Crown)
Prosecutor
Phillip Michael Summerfield
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for intimidation, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and sexual intercourse without consent
- 2 Assessment of offence seriousness and range
- 3 Application of general and specific deterrence principles in domestic violence cases
Ratio Decidendi
The offender committed serious offences of intimidation, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, and sexual intercourse without consent in a domestic context in breach of apprehended violence orders. Sentences must reflect the seriousness, need for specific and general deterrence, and community protection. An aggregate sentence consistent with s 53A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 is appropriate, with partial accumulation to account for subsequent offending. The offender's background and partial engagement in rehabilitation afford minimal mitigation. Imprisonment is the only appropriate sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed, sentences confirmed; offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed and convictions confirmed on file 2018/00384329 for s 326(1)(a) of the Crimes Act and s 14(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act.
- Aggregate sentence of 26 months (15 months non-parole) for appeal offences, to be served first.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment