R v Nguyen [2020] NSWDC 206
The appropriate sentence for Jamy Nguyen, having regard to the seriousness of the offences, criminal history, plea of guilty, and prospects of rehabilitation, is an aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 years 6 months with a non parole period of 5 years 8 months, commencing from 14 August 2018.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 years 6 months with a non parole period of 5 years 8 months imposed on offender.
- Legal Topics
- ['intimidation Intending to Cause Fear of Physical Harm' 'supplying Prohibited Drug' 'possess Prohibited Weapon Without Permit' 'possess Unauthorised Pistol' 'drive Motor Vehicle During Disqualification Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for offences including intimidation, supply of prohibited drugs, weapon offences, and driving while disqualified?']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence for Jamy Nguyen, having regard to the seriousness of the offences, criminal history, plea of guilty, and prospects of rehabilitation, is an aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 years 6 months with a non parole period of 5 years 8 months, commencing from 14 August 2018.
Court Disposition
Aggregate term of imprisonment of 9 years 6 months with a non parole period of 5 years 8 months imposed on offender.
Orders
- ['Aggregate sentence of 9 years 6 months imprisonment imposed.' 'Non-parole period fixed at 5 years 8 months from 14 August 2018 to 13 April 2024.' 'Balance of term is 3 years 10 months from 14 April 2024 to 13 February 2028.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment