Untan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1448
The decision to cancel the applicant's visa was made in contravention of a statutory obligation to afford procedural fairness to the applicant's wife. However, as the privative clause in s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applies, the decision is nonetheless immune from judicial review.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ion Untan; Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review of Administrative Decision / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Visa Cancellation, Procedural Fairness, Privative Clause, Natural Justice, Family Impacts of Visa Cancellation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ion Untan
Applicant
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review of Administrative Decision / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's wife and children were denied procedural fairness before the cancellation of the applicant's visa under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501(2)
- 2 Whether the privative clause in s 474 protects the decision from judicial review despite any denial of procedural fairness
Ratio Decidendi
The decision to cancel the applicant's visa was made in contravention of a statutory obligation to afford procedural fairness to the applicant's wife. However, as the privative clause in s 474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applies, the decision is nonetheless immune from judicial review.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment