Ionic Management Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1710
An agreement was reached by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the court, being satisfied it could have made such a decision properly, disposed of the proceedings by making orders reflecting the agreement without a merit assessment of the underlying issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- The appeal is upheld and development approval granted subject to conditions; amended plans relied upon; nominal costs awarded to council; proceedings disposed of per s 34(3) agreement.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 acceptable to the court']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement was reached by the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the court, being satisfied it could have made such a decision properly, disposed of the proceedings by making orders reflecting the agreement without a merit assessment of the underlying issues.
Court Disposition
The appeal is upheld and development approval granted subject to conditions; amended plans relied upon; nominal costs awarded to council; proceedings disposed of per s 34(3) agreement.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to rely on the amended plans referred to in condition 3 of Annexure A.' "Applicant to pay Council's costs thrown away pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $1." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Approval is granted to DA16/1668 for demolition of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment