IOSIF v S & M MOTORS PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) [1996] NSWCA 265
The discretion to extend time should be exercised in favour of the applicant, despite doubt, because there is no prejudice to the respondent and the applicant should not be shut out from an opportunity to have the original decision examined on appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Iosif; Respondent: S & M Motors Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application to extend time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Practice and Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iosif
Applicant
S & M Motors Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The discretion to extend time should be exercised in favour of the applicant, despite doubt, because there is no prejudice to the respondent and the applicant should not be shut out from an opportunity to have the original decision examined on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application to extend time granted.
Orders
- Time for filing a notice of appeal extended for seven days from 29 April 1996.
- Notice of appeal, as amended, may be filed and treated as served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment