Dobrijevich v Burge [2001] NSWSC 1176
It was not unreasonable for the plaintiff to seek a court-appointed trustee given prior discord, but the defendant's conduct was not such as to justify making his share alone bear the trustee company's costs; the usual allocation of trustee fees from the total proceeds should stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Motion Within Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment; Consideration of Distribution and Costs Following Sale Under Statutory Trust
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's motion to vary the statutory trust so the defendant alone bears the trustee company's costs dismissed. Costs of proceedings up to and including 16 August 2001 awarded to plaintiff; no order as to costs of the notice of motion.
- Legal Topics
- ['partition of Land' 'statutory Trust for Sale' 'variation of Statutory Trust' 'distribution of Sale Proceeds' 'apportionment of Trustee Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Motion Within Equity Proceedings / Post Judgment; Consideration of Distribution and Costs Following Sale Under Statutory Trust
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court has power to vary the statutory trust for sale after sale of the property so that only the defendant's share of the proceeds bears the trustee company's fees" 'Whether it is appropriate to alter the trust to shift trustee costs entirely to the defendant']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not unreasonable for the plaintiff to seek a court-appointed trustee given prior discord, but the defendant's conduct was not such as to justify making his share alone bear the trustee company's costs; the usual allocation of trustee fees from the total proceeds should stand.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's motion to vary the statutory trust so the defendant alone bears the trustee company's costs dismissed. Costs of proceedings up to and including 16 August 2001 awarded to plaintiff; no order as to costs of the notice of motion.
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 16 November 2001 is dismissed." "The defendant must pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings up to and including 16 August 2001." 'No order as to the costs of the notice of motion.' "Liberty to either party to apply on twelve hours' notice for directions as to dispersal...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment