Iron Wealth Pty Ltd trading as Makary Developments v Fairfield City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1110
The appeal is upheld and the amended development application approved, as the parties agreed at conciliation and the Court was satisfied that the decision could have been made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Post Conciliation Conference; Decision Following Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'demolition and Construction' 'judicial Approval' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application / Post Conciliation Conference; Decision Following Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal against the refusal of the development application should be upheld' 'Whether the amended development application should be approved']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the amended development application approved, as the parties agreed at conciliation and the Court was satisfied that the decision could have been made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. DA-675.1/2016 as per specified plans and documents.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. DA-675/2016 (as amended) is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure "A".']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment