Shields, Isaac John Mackay v The Official Receiver in Bankruptcy & Anor [1996] FCA 441
The appeal was incompetent because, after abandoning the appeal concerning his own section 77A notice and section 81 examination matter, the appellant had no legal or other relevant interest in the remaining questions concerning entry onto the bankrupts' property and the Nissan Patrol station wagon; his asserted mortgagee, trust-related, or creditor status did not give him standing to challenge those decisions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia / Full Court Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent.
- Legal Topics
- ['competency of Appeal' 'standing or Sufficient Interest to Appeal' 'bankruptcy Trustee Entry Onto Property' 'divisible Property of Bankrupts' 'bankruptcy Act Notice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia / Full Court Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant had a sufficient interest or was a relevant party entitled to prosecute an appeal about the trustee's entry onto the bankrupts' farm and the Nissan Patrol station wagon." 'Whether the appeal was competent after the appellant abandoned the part of the appeal concerning dismissal of his application in respect of the section 81 examination and the section 77A notice.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was incompetent because, after abandoning the appeal concerning his own section 77A notice and section 81 examination matter, the appellant had no legal or other relevant interest in the remaining questions concerning entry onto the bankrupts' property and the Nissan Patrol station wagon; his asserted mortgagee, trust-related, or creditor status did not give him standing to challenge those decisions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed as incompetent.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment