Lesianawai v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 454
The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to review the primary judge's refusal to extend time under s 477A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the appeal must be dismissed by operation of s 476A(3)(b) of the Migration Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Isaac Lesianawai; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to Review Migration Decisions, Federal Court Jurisdiction, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isaac Lesianawai
Applicant
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to review the primary judge's refusal to extend time under s 477A(2) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether procedural fairness was denied in Tribunal proceedings
- 3 Whether extension of time ought to have been granted to review migration decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court does not have jurisdiction to review the primary judge's refusal to extend time under s 477A(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and the appeal must be dismissed by operation of s 476A(3)(b) of the Migration Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The notice of appeal dated 27 August 2021 be dismissed.
- The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment