Solomon & Anor v Singh (No. 3) [2006] NSWADT 120
The Tribunal found that the non-acceptance by the Respondent of a reasonable Calderbank offer constituted special circumstances, as sufficient material had been supplied by the Applicants enabling the Respondent to form a reasonable opinion, and the Respondent's counter-offer was plainly inadequate. Costs should be awarded to the Applicants from the expiry of the Calderbank offer onwards.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Retail Lease Dispute / Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to Applicants from 7 June 2004 onward
- Legal Topics
- ['retail Leases' 'costs' 'mitigation of Loss' 'calderbank Offers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Retail Lease Dispute / Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special circumstances exist warranting the award of costs under Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 s 88 in a retail lease commercial dispute' 'Whether non-acceptance of a Calderbank offer constitutes a special circumstance for costs' 'Whether undisputed debt items or contractual indemnity clauses amount to special circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the non-acceptance by the Respondent of a reasonable Calderbank offer constituted special circumstances, as sufficient material had been supplied by the Applicants enabling the Respondent to form a reasonable opinion, and the Respondent's counter-offer was plainly inadequate. Costs should be awarded to the Applicants from the expiry of the Calderbank offer onwards.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to Applicants from 7 June 2004 onward
Orders
- ['The Respondent to pay the costs of the Applicant, including the costs of the costs application, as and from 7 June, 2004']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment