Sesay v Duran [2023] NSWCATAP 124
Although the dismissal decision was made in the appellant's absence and her case was not adequately put, the set aside application was filed three weeks out of time and no legitimate reason for the delay was shown. Any prejudice to the landlord could not be identified precisely, but possession had been returned to the landlord. The appellant's proposed challenge had little prospect of success because the Tribunal had heard both parties and it was open to terminate the tenancy for rent arrears and non-payment of rent and make an order for possession. Strict compliance with the time limit would not work an injustice, so an extension of time was refused and the set aside application was...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Appeal Panel Decision Dismissing Appeal for Non Appearance in Residential Tenancy Proceedings / Appeal Panel Determination on the Papers of Out of Time Set Aside Application
- Outcome
- Extension of time refused; set aside application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'set Aside Application' 'dismissal for Non Appearance' 'reinstatement of Appeal' 'termination for Rent Arrears' 'order for Possession']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Appeal Panel Decision Dismissing Appeal for Non Appearance in Residential Tenancy Proceedings / Appeal Panel Determination on the Papers of Out of Time Set Aside Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application to set aside the Appeal Panel decision was filed within time or whether time should be extended under s 41 of the NCAT Act.' "Whether the requirements in cl 9(1)(b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Regulation 2022 were satisfied because the dismissal decision was made in the appellant's absence and her case was not adequately put." 'Whether the discretion to set aside the dismissal decision should be exercised, including whether there would be a real likelihood of injustice if the decision stood and whether the appellant had an arguable case on appeal.' 'Whether the set aside application could be determined on the papers without an oral hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the dismissal decision was made in the appellant's absence and her case was not adequately put, the set aside application was filed three weeks out of time and no legitimate reason for the delay was shown. Any prejudice to the landlord could not be identified precisely, but possession had been returned to the landlord. The appellant's proposed challenge had little prospect of success because the Tribunal had heard both parties and it was open to terminate the tenancy for rent arrears and non-payment of rent and make an order for possession. Strict compliance with the time limit would not work an injustice, so an extension of time was refused and the set aside application was...
Court Disposition
Extension of time refused; set aside application dismissed.
Orders
- ['An extension of time to file the set aside application is refused.' 'The set aside application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment