Island Industries Pty Limited v Roadstone Construction Limited [2003] NFSC 5
Summary judgment was appropriate because the filed defence merely denied the debt and did not comply with the Rules, while the evidence indicated beyond any real doubt that $78,244.56 was owing to Island Industries for work done and materials supplied; Roadstone's possible independent claims against Island Industries did not constitute a defence to the debt or justify refusing summary judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Summary Judgment / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $78,244.56, with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Judgment' 'debt or Liquidated Demand' 'subcontract for Construction Work' 'possible Cross Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether summary judgment should be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $78,244.56.' 'Whether the filed defence complied with requirements for a defence to a claim for debt or liquidated demand.' 'Whether asserted possible cross-claims for liquidated damages or indemnity justified refusing summary judgment.']
Ratio Decidendi
Summary judgment was appropriate because the filed defence merely denied the debt and did not comply with the Rules, while the evidence indicated beyond any real doubt that $78,244.56 was owing to Island Industries for work done and materials supplied; Roadstone's possible independent claims against Island Industries did not constitute a defence to the debt or justify refusing summary judgment.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $78,244.56, with costs.
Orders
- ['Summary judgment be entered in favour of the plaintiff, Island Industries Pty Limited, in the sum of $78,244.56.' "The defendant, Roadstone Construction Limited, pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceeding generally and the application for summary judgment."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment