Campbell v The Public Trustee [2000] NSWSC 936
The Plaintiff was not established to have been the de facto spouse of the Deceased at the time of his death, but was an eligible person due to prior cohabitation and dependency; the relationship and her contributions warranted an order for provision, balancing her needs with those of the children entitled on intestacy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application (supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order for provision in favour of the Plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['intestacy' 'family Provision' 'de Facto Relationships']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application (supreme Court of Nsw, Equity Division) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Plaintiff was the de facto spouse of the Deceased at the time of his death' 'Whether the Plaintiff is an eligible person to apply for family provision' 'Whether there are factors warranting the making of an order in favour of the Plaintiff' 'How the competing claims of the eight children of the Deceased should be considered']
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff was not established to have been the de facto spouse of the Deceased at the time of his death, but was an eligible person due to prior cohabitation and dependency; the relationship and her contributions warranted an order for provision, balancing her needs with those of the children entitled on intestacy.
Court Disposition
Order for provision in favour of the Plaintiff
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to receive a legacy of $20,000 out of the estate of the late Kevin Morgan, not to bear interest if paid on or before 3 November 2000, and to bear Supreme Court interest thereafter if unpaid.' 'Legacy to be borne by the part of the interstate estate to which the children, other than Kevina Lee Porter, are...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment